I tend to root for the underdog. In a shelter situation, that's usually
a dog with medical or behavior problems. Having been an employee and
(currently) a volunteer in a "no-kill" shelter, I've fallen for many
animals who never made it out despite the "no kill" label. Some succumbed to disease or illness,
but at least an equal number were euthanized for behavior problems that
could not (or would not) be solved.
This is an incredibly difficult thing to deal with. I can't tell you
the number of hours I've spent trying to rehabilitate and socialize
animals with behavior issues only to see them either euthanized in the
shelter or shortly after adoption. The reasons given are liability and
adoptability, but in many cases I have to say I believe the real issues
is not having the resources to identify and deal with the problem early
and on the organizational (rather than the individual) level.
Our shelter used to have a behaviorist that would come in an volunteer her
time testing and giving tips on working with the animals that had
issues. But, her advice was given to one person who was tasked with spreading the word on the training plan. There was no consensus. There was no way of asking the trainer questions or otherwise allowing volunteers (some of whom think they qualify as a behaviorist themselves) to buy into the plan. So, everyone did what they thought was best which meant the dogs were confused and the trainer was frustrated, so I assume she got tired of wasting her time and no longer comes to the shelter.
But, when an animal has a medical issue, even in a shelter environment,
it's usually treated. If behavior issues can be fatal, why aren't they
treated the same as a medical issue? With professional advice and a
structure in place for implementing the recommended training, I think
we'd see a lot more animals surviving the shelter environment and
getting adopted.
Of course, that touches on two main issues that are probably the reasons
this isn't done. 1. There are too many pets out there anyway and some
might say that the loss of a dog with a behavior issue likely saves a
dog without one. That may be true. And 2, behavior issues aren't as
easily solved as many medical issues are. It's not as easy as one pill
twice a day or some salve to put on a wound. Instead it requires time,
training, and liability. ...and the outcome you hope for is
adaptability, but given their history they will never be as adoptable as
most other dogs and will likely take up space on the adoption floor for
awhile before the right adopter comes along.
That brings me to another issue -the selectivity of potential adopters
by shelters. They often won't adopt to you if you'll be gone more than 8
hours, you don't have a fenced-in yard, you've never owned that breed
before, you have kids, you have a roommate, you or your child have a
disability, etc. Anything that sets off alarms to the particular
counselor you are talking to is grounds to deny you the adoption even if
the next counselor would have said yes. Why are we being so picky (and
in some cases discriminating based on race, age, sexual orientation,
and/or disability) if so many pets are dying? How can they not think
that the adopter they turned down is just going to the pet store down
the street to buy a puppy mill dog? Is that ever weighed into the decision at all?
And maybe if we didn't make people go through an interrogation to adopt a
shelter animal adoptions would go up and puppy mills would loose
business and profitability? Maybe if people felt they could answer the
adoption counselor's questions truthfully they'd get better advice and
more adoptions would be successful.
Then again, maybe I'm just naive. Or maybe there's a middle ground.
And maybe other shelters are run better (I hope they are!). But, all of
this has sparked something in me. I look forward to being a Vet Tech
with my hands in the poop and my eyes throbbing from looking into a
microscope too long for as long as possible, but when I'm too old and
can't do it anymore I would really love to start a shelter. I
understand that I'd have to be the one to make the call on euthanizing a
dog for aggression, but at least when I made that decision I'd
understand and agree with it. I'd have the time, ability, and resources
to look for other options before that needle hit the vein and it was
too late.
I hate being the victim of someone else's decision. I hate nodding my
head "yes" when they tell me they've done everything they could while
knowing there were options that were not explored. But I do because at
the time it doesn't matter. The decision is made. My friend is dead.
But I do hold some hope that one day I can make a difference in some of these dogs' lives.
RIP Vixey, Mike, Boris, and the many others.
I believe in EVERYTHING you just posted here.
ReplyDelete